Debate 08
Extremism in defense of justice is no vice.
Against the motion
Ist innings
First of all, I would like to apologize as I have not been able to prepare for this debate. The format of the debate is such that it was a logistical impossibility for me and Himanshu to practice together. In fact, I feel the format of the debate has done a great injustice has been done to me. And as the topic of the debate is Extremism in defense of justice is not a vice, I can go to any extreme to defend justice. And the most extreme measure which I can currently think of is to get some tomatoes from the cafe and throw them at the person who decided to with this format. So right now the question before the house is whether I should be allowed to throw tomatoes as it would not be a vice, or should I be restrained as it may be a vice after all.
2nd innings
As many of the previous speakers have pointed out, justice is subjective. If i see it from the judges point of view, they just wanted SAASC speakers to bond better. Now, what could Raina do if Himanshu and I are not made for each other. Just my luck.
Look at Kshitij and GSB, each and every move appeared to have been practised for nights together. True Mechanchis. Keep the Mechanchi Flag flying high.
And its official now. SAASC is an active supporter of liberal rights movement.
"Please stop trying to recruit me into homosexuality."
Anyways, thanks for having me. Have a gay day :)
Debate 07
American interventionism in Afghanistan is neo-imperialism
against the motion
I would like to start wid an analogy. Afghanistan is like Aishwarya Rai. Aishwarya was fucked by A and then by B and finally loved by AB. Similarly Afghanistan was fucked by Russia, and then by Pakistan and finally is being loved by America.
It is beyond me how you can say that kind of stuff and still get away with it smiling :P
it is actually getting quite difficult to get away wid it...remember the opensourced punchlines???